Sayfalar

16 Eylül 2011 Cuma

Cantaloupe Outbreak in Colorado, New Mexico and Other States Investigated by Listeria Food Poisoning Lawyers

Our attorneys are investigating a cantaloupe outbreak linked to Rocky Ford cantaloupe grown in Colorado. People in at least seven states have contracted Listeria infections after eating Rocky Ford cantaloupe.

Prompted by the outbreak, Jensen Farms of Holly, Colorado, has recalled cantaloupes shipped between July 29th, 2011 and September 10th 2011, and distributed to the following states: IL, WY, TN, UT, TX, CO, MN, KS, NM, NC, MO, NE, OK, AZ, NJ, NY, PA.

The recalled cantaloupes have a green and white sticker that reads: Product of USA- Frontera Produce-Colorado Fresh-Rocky Ford-Cantaloupe or a gray, yellow, and green sticker that reads: Jensen Farms-Sweet Rocky Fords. Our attorneys are available for a free consultation regarding a cantaloupe lawsuit.
We are a national food safety law firm. The cantaloupe outbreak has now sickened 22 people in seven states. Two people, one in New Mexico, one in Colorado have died, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  The confirmed cases are as follows: Colorado (12), Indiana (1), Nebraska (1), New Mexico (4), Oklahoma (1), Texas (2), and West Virginia (1).

The cantaloupe was sold at retailers nationwide, including Wal-Mart, Whole Foods Market, Safeway and others. Safeway has pulled the melons from its 118 supermarkets in Colorado. Whole Foods Market has removed the cantaloupes from all 27 in the Rocky Mountain region, which includes Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas and Utah.


Illnesses associated with this outbreak began on or after August 15, 2011. The victims range in age from 38 to 96 years, but most are women over 60.

Listeriosis is caused by eating food contaminated with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. The disease primarily affects older adults,  people with weakened immune systems, pregnant women, and newborns.

A person with listeriosis usually has fever and muscle aches, often preceded by diarrhea or other gastrointestinal symptoms. If you have an illness associated with this outbreak, contact PritzkerOlsen, P.A., for a free case consultation at 1-888-377-8900 (Toll Free) or submit contact information online.

Listeriosis concern prompts cantaloupe recall

A recall of cantaloupes shipped by Jensen Farms is underway with the FDA warning consumers not to eat them because of potential listeria contamination. The Rocky Ford cantaloupes shipped by Jensen Farms of Granada, Colorado to at least 17 states – including Illinois, Missouri and Nebraska – are linked to an outbreak of listeriosis, which is a serious illness that is potentially fatal.
The Centers for Disease Control says at least 22 people in seven states have been infected with the identified strains of the bacteria as of Wednesday, September 14th .
The cantaloupe may be labeled “Colorado Grown, Distributed by Frontera Produce, USA, Pesticide Free, Jensenfarms.com, Sweet Rocky Fords.”
Not all of the recalled cantaloupes are labeled.
FDA RECALLS

 

It’s Scarlett Johansson like you’ve never seen her before — naked!


Scarlett Johansson appears to be the latest victim of a nude photo HACKER — after multiple self-shot naked cell phone pics of the actress appeared on a popular website this morning.
It’s Scarlett Johansson like you’ve never seen her before — naked!
In the first photo Scarlett Johansson goes topless while offering a seductive stare. In the second snap, the 26-year-old actress redefines what it means to be butt naked.
Scarlett Johansson, of course, is not the first celeb to face a nude photo scandal. (And, let’s face it, she won’t be the last.) Disney queen Vanessa Hudgens bared it all in a series of cell phone pictures taken via a mirror never intending for those photos to see the light of day. They were intended for her boyfriend, she claimed, but a hacker got their hands on them and they hit the internet. After a second and third leak, Vanessa admitted they were all from the same series of photos and that legal action would be taken.
Most recently, Blake Lively sought comfort in the arms of boyfriend Leonardo DiCaprio after photos alleged to be of her made their way onto the internet. Blake’s reps flat out denied the allegations and claimed they’d send threatening letters to anyone who published the pics and implied it was her.
We have a feeling camp Scarlett Johansson will do the same.
Supposing the two photos are real, it seems that Scarlett took them while being in a hotel. The first photo was captured in the bathroom revealing actress’s body in front of a mirror, while the second snapshot shows Johansson lying sideways on a bed and highlighting the right breast.
The release drew quite a lot of attention as it’s most likely to become an investigation case for FBI. It was reported that the actress was the lattest victim of a nude photo hacker. Some sources revealed that the photo hacking might be ranked as a criminal act...


15 Eylül 2011 Perşembe

Thoughts on The Lion King in 3D





Ahead of its Blu-ray/Blu-ray 3D debut on October 4, The Lion King will once again roar into theaters beginning tomorrow for a two-week run in digital 3D.




A few weeks ago I caught a screening and came away with decidedly mixed feelings.



Some scenes are, as you can imagine, a thrill to watch with added dimension. But others—pun—fall flat. Many are stuck uncomfortably in the middle. Certain shots of the lions’ faces seemed to have a bizarre papercraft look.



So The Lion King didn’t make me into a fan of the 2-D to 3-D conversion process for traditionally animated films, which I had been very optimistic about. That said, pretty much anything that gets classic Disney films back on the big screen is a good thing.



But Disney’s resources would probably have been better spent on converting one of Pixar’s gems, like WALL-E or Finding Nemo, to 3-D. (Ratatouille 3-D is confirmed to be in the works.)





Review: ‘The Lion King’ Makes Me Cry All Over Again in 3D


A childhood classic getting the 3D treatment? A review for such a thing can consist of one question with just one answer – “how does it look?” I am pleased to report that Disney’s The Lion King 3D looks just fine, but it would probably serve Disney well to invent some kind of 3D glasses that allow you to cry and see at the same time. That sort of answers the second, more film-specific question moviegoers may have when it comes to a gussied up version of The Lion King in 3D – is it still wrenching to watch? Yes, sweet goodness, yes.



The story of young lion prince Simba is an old one – no, literally, not just in terms of how long the film has been around, but in terms of that it’s essentially Hamleton the savanna (with other sources contributing, sometimes a bit too closely, to the film’s plot, but that’s an issue for another day). Simba (voiced as a child by Jonathan Taylor Thomas, and seriously, where hell is JTT these days?) is the cub prince of the Pridelands, son of the brave king Mufasa (voiced by James Earl Jones, in a piece of casting that is both strikingly great and thuddingly obvious) and the very lovely queen Sarabi.


Everything is really fantastic in the Pridelands, everyone is super happy and really jazzed about the birth of baby Simba, he who just can’t wait to be king – everyone except his own ugly uncle, the evil Scar (voiced by Jeremy Irons). Scar is a class-A loser – he doesn’t get to rule the kingdom, he doesn’t get to kick it on Pride Rock, he’s inexplicably facially scarred (which makes me wonder, what is Scar’s given name?), his best friends are hyenas, and so on and so forth. It’s just a miserable existence for the guy, which is why he ultimately crafts a plan to kill Mufasa, which he will he then blame on Simba, who will react in a way that either makes him vulnerable to being killed or damaged enough to run away from the Pridelands forever. There’s also singing and dancing. And now it’s in 3D.



The 3D, on a very basic level, looks fine. It’s not nearly as immersive as it could be, and the moments where it could be truly transcendent never quite reach their potential. Case in point – the whispering wind sequence where a now-grown Simba sees his father in the clouds and the leaves, an already beautiful and colorful sequence that also features a ton of on-screen movement that should translate to 3D gold. The sequence is still as lovely as ever, but the 3D doesn’t render it any more lovely than it was originally. The death of Mufasa is not more sad, the hellish gathering of Scar and the hyenas is not more scary, the final battle is not more stirring – it’s all the same, but with an extra dimension that works only in the most technical of ways.



Of course, this all begs the question – was this conversion even necessary? As in most cases with this sort of thing, I take a pretty hard line of “actually, no.”



The rise of 3D technology as of late fails to thrill me, though it doesn’t quite stir my ire the way that it does for other film writers. I don’t find it necessary, but I understand that it’s a nifty way for studios to get some inflated box office numbers (though it’s impossible to talk about presumed cash-grabs without also considering the funding that is required to actually make 3D films, it’s not like they emerge like the cinematic equivalent of Athena, fully sprung from their creators’ minds). But, that all said, yes, 3D films “make” more at the box office because tickets cost more. Is that what Disney is doing with their Lion King 3D then? Not so much, the film is in theaters for just two weeks before hitting home video (for the first time in Disney Digital 3D), making it seem more like its theatrical release is more of an “event” for fans of the film, young and old, with 3D serving as an extra dash of flavor, not the entire (antelope-based) meal.



So, if The Lion King 3D isn’t so notable for its 3D, does it work as an overall experience? Yes.



It only occurred to me that I hadn’t seen The Lion King for at least fifteen years the moment the opening credits queued up. It’s possible that I hadn’t seen the film since I first saw it in theaters as a child. I distinctly remember seeing The Lion King in theaters as a child – I was ten years old at the time, and I remember the exact theater (an old AMC on Charleston Blvd. in Las Vegas) and the exact seat (middle of middle section, left side aisle seat), and I remember that my dad skiffed off on watching the film with my best friend and I to see an actioner in the theater at the same time (a quick review of the other films out around Lion King’s release date signal that he was probably taking in either Blown Away or The Shadow). But what I remember most clearly is that The Lion King was the first film I ever cried during – real tears, consistent sobs, coming throughout the film.



Which is why I caught myself routinely lifting my 3D glasses off my face during the more hard-hitting scenes in the film (not because I was crying and the tears were impairing my vision, no no, not that at all) to see what the kids in the audience were doing. They were not crying, but they were enthralled by The Lion King 3D, the way only kids can be really enthralled by a film, truly entranced by what they are seeing on screen – on the edges of their seats, open-mouthed, leaning so far forward that it’s like they wanted to get inside the screen. Hell, if 3D enhances that experience for the whippersnappers in the audience, even me, at my most faux-crotchety, cannot object to the technology.



Are kids these days so overstimulated by television and Twitter and Facebook and smell-o-vision and movies that feature 3D guinea pigs fighting crime that they need that “extra dimension” to get them to engage with a film? I’m not quite sure, I am not a child and I don’t have any, but I think it’s unreasonable to throw such wide nets on what works for kids and what doesn’t. But what I do know is that The Lion King 3D is as wonderful a film as ever, and if it takes one more layer of en vogue technical whosiwhatsit to make it interesting and accessible to a new generation, I’m all in, I’ll stop swearing down 3D, and I’ll tell anyone and everyone to get their tails in a seat for The Lion King in 3D or Whatever It Is Kids These Days Are Into.



The Lion King 3D is in select theaters for two weeks, starting tomorrow, September 16.




Rep Confirms January Jones Gives Birth to Baby Boy




The Betty Draper of 'Mad Men' names her first child, who was born Tuesday, September 13, Xander Dane Jones, but still keeps the identity of the father under tight wraps.



It's a boy for January Jones. The actress famous for her portrayal of Betty Draper on "Mad Men" has given birth to her first child Xander Dane Jones on Tuesday, September 13. To the press, a representative for the 33-year-old shares that both the mother and the baby are "doing great".



The "X-Men: First Class" beauty has chosen to keep the sex of her baby a secret even from herself. Recently, she opened up to KRQ radio-show hosts Johnjay and Rich that she was having a hard time choosing a name because of her decision not to learn of her baby's sex. Still, she explained that she's not into weird names, explaining "I don't want to be too cliche about it."



January revealed she was expecting her first child back in April. Considering that the actress has split from boyfriend Jason Sudeikis in January, questions about who fathers the baby quickly surfaced. Still, an inside source told PEOPLE at the time, "She's really looking forward to this new chapter in her life as a single mom."



January Jones Is A First Time Mom




Mad Men star January Jones has given birth to a baby boy.



The actress announced she was to become a first-time mom in April and she welcomed son Xander Dane Jones on Tuesday.



The 33 year old's representative tells People.com mother and baby are "doing great".



Jones has so far refused to reveal the identity of the tot's father.


Visible Only From Above, Mystifying Nazca Lines Discovered in Mideast




They are the Middle East's own version of the Nazca Lines - ancient "geolyphs," or drawings, that span deserts in southern Peru - and now, thanks to new satellite-mapping technologies, and an aerial photography program in Jordan, researchers are discovering more of them than ever before. They number well into the thousands.


Referred to by archaeologists as "wheels," these stone structures have a wide variety of designs, with a common one being a circle with spokes radiating inside. Researchers believe that they date back to antiquity, at least 2,000 years ago. They are often found on lava fields and range from 82 feet to 230 feet (25 meters to 70 meters) across. [See gallery of wheel structures]



"In Jordan alone we've got stone-built structures that are far more numerous than (the) Nazca Lines, far more extensive in the area that they cover, and far older," said David Kennedy, a professor of classics and ancient history at the University of Western Australia.



Kennedy's new research, which will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Archaeological Science, reveals that these wheels form part of a variety of stone landscapes. These include kites (stone structures used for funnelling and killing animals); pendants (lines of stone cairns that run from burials); and walls, mysterious structures that meander across the landscape for up to several hundred feet and have no apparent practical use.



His team's studies are part of a long-term aerial reconnaissance project that is looking at archaeological sites across Jordan. As of now, Kennedy and his colleagues are puzzled as to what the structures may have been used for or what meaning they held. [History's Most Overlooked Mysteries]



Fascinating structures



Kennedy's main area of expertise is in Roman archaeology, but he became fascinated by these structures when, as a student, he read accounts of Royal Air Force pilots flying over them in the 1920s on airmail routes across Jordan. "You can't not be fascinated by these things," Kennedy said.



Indeed, in 1927 RAF Flight Lt. Percy Maitland published an account of the ruins in the journal Antiquity. He reported encountering them over "lava country" and said that they, along with the other stone structures, are known to the Bedouin as the "works of the old men."



Kennedy and his team have been studying the structures using aerial photography and Google Earth, as the wheels are hard to pick up from the ground, Kennedy said.



"Sometimes when you're actually there on the site you can make out something of a pattern but not very easily," he said. "Whereas if you go up just a hundred feet or so it, for me, comes sharply into focus what the shape is."



The designs must have been clearer when they were originally built. "People have probably walked over them, walked past them, for centuries, millennia, without having any clear idea what the shape was."



(The team has created an archive of images of the wheels from various sites in the Middle East.)



What were they used for?



So far, none of the wheels appears to have been excavated, something that makes dating them, and finding out their purpose, more difficult. Archaeologists studying them in the pre-Google Earth era speculated that they could be the remains of houses or cemeteries. Kennedy said that neither of these explanations seems to work out well.



"There seems to be some overarching cultural continuum in this area in which people felt there was a need to build structures that were circular."



Some of the wheels are found in isolation while others are clustered together. At one location, near the Azraq Oasis, hundreds of them can be found clustered into a dozen groups. "Some of these collections around Azraq are really quite remarkable," Kennedy said.



In Saudi Arabia, Kennedy's team has found wheel styles that are quite different: Some are rectangular and are not wheels at all; others are circular but contain two spokes forming a bar often aligned in the same direction that the sun rises and sets in the Middle East.



The ones in Jordan and Syria, on the other hand, have numerous spokes and do not seem to be aligned with any astronomical phenomena. "On looking at large numbers of these, over a number of years, I wasn't struck by any pattern in the way in which the spokes were laid out," Kennedy said.



Cairns are often found associated with the wheels. Sometimes they circle the perimeter of the wheel, other times they are in among the spokes. In Saudi Arabia some of the cairns look, from the air, like they are associated with ancient burials.



Dating the wheels is difficult, since they appear to be prehistoric, but could date to as recently as 2,000 years ago. The researchers have noted that the wheels are often found on top of kites, which date as far back as 9,000 years, but never vice versa. "That suggests that wheels are more recent than the kites," Kennedy said.



Amelia Sparavigna, a physics professor at Politecnico di Torino in Italy, told Live Science in an email that she agrees these structures can be referred to as geoglyphs in the same way as the Nazca Lines are. "If we define a 'geoglyph' as a wide sign on the ground of artificial origin, the stone circles are geoglyphs," Sparavignawrote in her email.



The function of the wheels may also have been similar to the enigmatic drawings in the Nazca desert. [Science as Art: A Gallery]



"If we consider, more generally, the stone circles as worship places of ancestors, or places for rituals connected with astronomical events or with seasons, they could have the same function of [the] geoglyphs of South America, the Nazca Lines for instance. The design is different, but the function could be the same," she wrote in her email.



Kennedy said that for now the meaning of the wheels remains a mystery. "The question is what was the purpose?"


Riddle in the sands: Thousands of strange 'Nazca Lines' discovered in the Middle East
























































Peru’s Nazca Lines, the mysterious geoglyphs etched into the desert centuries ago by indigenous groups, are world famous – and now thousands of similar patterns have been found in the Middle East.








Satellite and aerial photography has revealed mysterious stone ‘wheels’ that are more numerous and older than the Nazca Lines in countries such as Syria, Saudi Arabia and Jordan.








The structures are thought to date back 2,000 years, but why they were built is baffling archaeologists and historians.















Ancient mystery: The stone wheels are thought to be 2,000 years old















Hidden: Thousands of people have probably walked past the structures and not realised what they were















Baffling: None of the Nazca Line-like patterns appear to be lined up with astronomical phenomena








‘In Jordan alone we've got stone-built structures that are far more numerous than the Nazca Lines, far more extensive in the area that they cover, and far older,’ David Kennedy, a professor of classics and ancient history at the University of Western Australia, told Live Science.






















He added: ‘People have probably walked over them, walked past them, for centuries, millennia, without having any clear idea what the shape was.’








The local Bedouin, a nomadic people found in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Libya, Egypt and Israel, call them the ‘works of the old men’.








They are often found on lava fields – but don’t fall into any pattern, according to Kennedy, whose research into them will be published in an upcoming issue of the Journal Of Archaeological Science.















Similar: The ancient and mysterious Nazca Lines in the Nazca Desert in Peru








He explains that they come in a huge variety of forms, some being ‘kites’, structures that funnelled animals, some being seemingly random meandering lines of stone and others being rectangular.








None are believed to be aligned with the stars, which has added to the mystery surrounding their purpose.








They were actually first discovered in 1927 by an RAF pilot called Lt. Percy Maitland, but it wasn’t until Professor Kennedy and his team began studying aerial and Google Earth photographs that their true extent was revealed.








A final count has yet to be completed, but Kennedy is certain they run into the thousands.















Local knowledge: The Bedouin call the structures the 'work of the old men'

Visible Only From Above Mystifying Nazca Lines Discovered In Mideast




They stretch from Syria to Saudi Arabia, can be seen from the air but not the ground, and are virtually unknown to the public.



They are the Middle East’s own version of the Nazca Lines — ancient “geolyphs,” or drawings, that span deserts in southern Peru — and now, thanks to new satellite-mapping technologies, and an aerial photography program in Jordan, researchers are discovering more of them than ever before. They number well into the thousands.



Referred to by archaeologists as “wheels,” these stone structures have a wide variety of designs, with a common one being a circle with spokes radiating inside. Researchers believe that they date back to antiquity, at least 2,000 years ago. They are often found on lava fields and range from 82 feet to 230 feet (25 meters to 70 meters) across. [See gallery of wheel structures]



“In Jordan alone we’ve got stone-built structures that are far more numerous than (the) Nazca Lines, far more extensive in the area that they cover, and far older,” said David Kennedy, a professor of classics and ancient history at the University of Western Australia.



Kennedy’s new research, which will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Archaeological Science, reveals that these wheels form part of a variety of stone landscapes. These include kites (stone structures used for funnelling and killing animals); pendants (lines of stone cairns that run from burials); and walls, mysterious structures that meander across the landscape for up to several hundred feet and have no apparent practical use.



His team’s studies are part of a long-term aerial reconnaissance project that is looking at archaeological sites across Jordan. As of now, Kennedy and his colleagues are puzzled as to what the structures may have been used for or what meaning they held.


Nick Lowe




by Noel Murray September 12, 2011


In Set List, we talk to veteran musicians about some of their most famous songs, learning about their lives and careers (and maybe hearing a good backstage anecdote or two) in the process.



The musician: Nick Lowe has been a working singer-songwriter since the late ’60s, when he and the band Brinsley Schwarz (named for its guitar player) brought American-style country-rock to the UK pub scene. Lowe went on to a successful solo and producing career, and is responsible for some of the best-loved songs of the New Wave era, including “Cruel To Be Kind” and “(What’s So Funny ’Bout) Peace, Love, And Understanding.” Over the past couple of decades, Lowe has returned to his folk and country roots, turning up every few years with elegant, understated LPs full of twangy songs about growing old and trying to make relationships work. His latest in that vein is The Old Magic, out September 13 on Yep Roc.



“Checkout Time” (from 2011’s The Old Magic)


Nick Lowe: It’s funny how that song seems to interest people, judging so far from the people I’ve spoken to. I try to avoid writing autobiographical songs. I write about what I know, but I’m one of those people, like Randy Newman, who make up a character and then make them say stuff. It’s not really me; it’s just a character I’ve made up. But this thing does actually say, “I’m 61, and I thought I’d never make 30.” And the reason for that is, I was sitting at home watching the television and fiddling around with the guitar, and I came up with a tune. And I’d just heard Johnny Cash singing, “I’m 61 years old, I never thought I’d see 30.” I can’t remember if those were the actual words, but that was the idea. I just heard Johnny Cash sing that, and it just went from there. I can’t honestly say whether it’s morbid, in that, “Here I am, considering the Grim Reaper tapping me on the shoulder. It’s time for me to get my thoughts out.” It’s much more joking for me, really.



AVC: People tend to take these kinds of songs as an artist in his last years, looking back.



NL: That’s right, he’s declining. “As the light dims.” I quite understand it, but it’s not really as serious a rumination as that.



Brinsley Schwarz, “Surrender To The Rhythm” (from 1972’s Nervous On The Road)


NL: I think that’s probably the product of the Van Morrison obsession we had at the time. We were great fans of his first few records. Up to Tupelo Honey, I suppose. We loved those records. Moondance. I still sort of think of my time with Brinsley Schwarz as like going to college, because we all lived in a house together, we all listened to the same records, and it was like going to school or something like that. We were all trying to write songs. And, of course, we were kids, and when you’re trying to start out, you wear your influences on your sleeve. That’s the way it goes. You write your heroes’ song catalogues, until one day, if you’re lucky, you write something original, which will probably be an amalgamation of all your heroes’ song catalogues that you’ve absorbed up ’til then. Suddenly, you’ll come up with an idea on your own, but based on something you’ve heard before. Because it’s all been done. There’s nothing original under the sun; it’s just the combination of influences that make it original.



Brinsley Schwarz, “(What’s So Funny ’Bout) Peace, Love, And Understanding” (from 1974’s The New Favourites Of Brinsley Schwarz)



NL: Well, that leads neatly on from what I just saying, because I always think of that song as being the first original idea I had. I can remember writing it quite clearly. I remember actually being really kind of shocked by the title. I came up with the title, and I couldn’t believe I’d actually made it up myself. I’d never heard it before. It wasn’t something I’d heard off another record and changed the words slightly to suit me, which was how I’d written songs up until then, while I was sort of learning. And then one day this title popped into my head: “(What’s So Funny ’Bout) Peace, Love, And Understanding” and I thought, “Great, great title, and I can’t believe you would come up with it.” [Laughs.] I always would ’fess up that there is one lick in the tune I did steal from Judee Sill. She had a song called “Jesus Was A Cross Maker” at about that time that I really thought was a super song. I haven’t heard that song for many years, but I always think I took a little lick in “Peace, Love, And Understanding” from Judy’s song. But apart from that, yes, that was my first original song.



AVC: Once you had the title, how long did it take you to write the rest?



NL: Oh, not very long at all. I think it really came very quickly. Because the original idea of it was that everything was changing. The old hippie thing was changing. I wrote the song in 1973, and the hippie thing was going out, and everyone was starting to take harder drugs and rediscover drink. Alcohol was coming back, and everyone sort of slipped out of the hippie dream and into a more cynical and more unpleasant frame of mind. And this song was supposed to be an old hippie, laughed at by the new thinking, saying to these new smarty-pants types, “Look, you think you got it all going on. You can laugh at me, but all I’m saying is ‘What’s so funny about peace, love, and understanding?’” And that was the idea of the song. But I think as I started writing it, something told me it was too good idea to make it into a joke. It was originally supposed to be a joke song, but something told me there was a little grain of wisdom in this thing, and not to mess it up. Just to keep it real simple, and don’t be too clever with it. Because I thought I was hot stuff back then, when I really, really wasn’t. I had a lot to learn. As I said, this was my first decent, proper, original idea I’d had, and something told me just to take it easy. And I’m glad I did, because otherwise that song would have died when Brinsley Schwarz died. Not the guy, the group. [Laughs.] Had it not been for Elvis Costello, who used to come and see us when he was a kid and really liked that song… well, he brought it to the world, so to speak. Because when he recorded it, he gave it that anthemic quality which everyone reacted really well to.



“I Love The Sound Of Breaking Glass” (from 1978’s Jesus Of Cool)


NL: That was a song which was sort of made up in the studio. I had the vague idea of the tune, and that’s why in the writing credits, I cut the bass player and the drummer in on the song, because they made it, really. The drums and bass are really great on that song. Steve Goulding and Andy Bodnar used to play with Graham Parker And The Rumour, whose records I produced, and they played bass and drums on “I Love The Sound Of Breaking Glass.” Their contribution was so great, I gave them a third each. In fact, I should have actually given Bob Andrews, who played piano on it, a taste of the record. The piano is so great. But that was much later. We’d sort of divided up the songwriting. But there we are.



“Big Kick, Plain Scrap!” (from 1979’s Labour Of Lust)


NL: I used to share a flat with my manager, Jake Riviera, who actually is still my manager. Back then we had this really squalid apartment in London, and he had all this junk. This little flat was filled with junk. And one of the things in the flat was this old-fashioned advertisement for a brand of tobacco, which was called Big Kick. The tobacco was called Big Kick, and it was rolling tobacco, which they used to call “plain scrap.” And so he had this little cardboard advert that you propped up on the counter, I suppose. I’d never seen it before or since. I think it’s American, actually. But actually, he had this thing in the flat that said, “Big kick, plain scrap,” and it was the sort of nonsensical combination of words that appealed to me back then. So I came up with something.



AVC: What’s interesting about both “Breaking Glass” and “Big Kick” is that if you played them for somebody who wasn’t familiar with those songs but was familiar with your work in general, they wouldn’t necessarily know it was you. “Big Kick, Plain Scrap!” almost sounds like something off of an early ’80s Prince album, even though it was recorded a couple of years earlier. Those early solo albums of yours were so eclectic. Were you were trying to show that you could do anything, or were you just in the mood to try anything?



NL: It’s very hard to remember back then. It seems that anything went in those days. I’d been waiting for a chance to make a noise, and along it came. And sometimes I didn’t really have anything to say, I just wanted to make a noise and say, “Here I am.” And sometimes I got lucky and did something that was actually quite good. A lot of the time it was real old nonsense that nowadays would get you laughed out of the place. But back then everything was changing in pop music, and a lot of the underdogs suddenly got a chance, and swept away a lot of the mainstream stuff. At the time it was very exciting. Now I’m older and I hear a lot of the stuff that we thought was no good back then. I kind of think we were wrong; it was good. Some of the stuff we thought we were replacing with our wonderful stuff, we were mistaken. But no, I don’t remember thinking about it too much. That was the whole point of it really. You just went ahead with an idea, and bang, out it would come. And if it didn’t work, then there’d be another good idea along in a minute. I think probably quite a lot of good ideas were lost in the hurry. Everyone was in a hurry back then.



“Cruel To Be Kind” (from 1979’s Labour Of Lust)


NL: That was another Brinsley Schwarz song, which I wrote with “The Love I Lost,” by Harold Melvin And The Blue Notes in mind. Originally it sounded like Harold Melvin And The Blue Notes—the same groove, anyway. When I do that song nowadays with my band, we do it much more like the Brinsley version, which means we do it much more like Harold Melvin And The Blue Notes, and it works really great. But when I signed to Columbia, when Mr. Geller signed me to Columbia records, me and Elvis, he asked me to record “Cruel To Be Kind.” I was very happy to do that for him.



AVC: Why do you think that one became such a big hit?



NL: Well, I couldn’t hear it, really. It was Gregg Geller. He really sort of insisted. He heard a demo of this song. We never actually recorded… well, strike that, we did do a serious recording of it, but we broke up before the record came out. But Gregg Geller heard the demo of us doing it, and he said, “Look, I really want you to do ‘Cruel To Be Kind.’” And I didn’t think he was serious, but he insisted. So I recorded it with Rockpile. We did a lot of records together in those days, but we couldn’t call ourselves Rockpile. Both me and Dave Edmunds. Dave Edmunds was doing solo records too, but it was all Rockpile. It was always the same four people. Anyway, we recorded it, and it was a really good version of the song. The harmonies sounded fantastic on the radio. I remember coming to Los Angeles when it was a hit, and did that thing where you change the radio station, and it was on about two or three at the same time. You could hear it starting on one station and finishing on another. Amazing.



“All Men Are Liars” (from 1990’s Party Of One)


NL: When I was over here once I was watching an edition of The Oprah Winfrey Show, a very early edition of The Oprah Winfrey Show. They had some poor sap sitting there who’d run off with a maid or something like that, and the audience was extremely upset with this guy. I remember this large black lady standing up and shouting at the top of her voice, “All men are liars! All men are liars! All men are liars!” She just was chanting it. And I thought, “Yeah, you know what? You’ve got a point there, darling.” And along came that song.



It’s got that line about Rick Astley in it. [“Do you remember Rick Astley / He had a big fat hit that was ghastly / He said ‘I’m never gonna give you up or let you down’ / Well I’m here to tell you that Dick’s a clown.”] At the time, he was everywhere. “Never Gonna Give You Up” was just on all the time. It drove me mad. [Impersonates Astley.] That constricted voice. And so I put that rather barbed line in, which I regret now. I hardly ever do the song. I went through a phase of doing it fairly recently, but it sort of went off the boil and I stopped doing it. But when I used to do the Rick Astley line, people used to fall about, rolling in the aisles, clutching their sides laughing, and I thought, “This is rather a shame to do this. Poor old Rick. He’s not exactly in the public eye much anymore. It seems a little unfair to kick him when he’s down.” So I think that’s part of the reason why I stopped doing it.



AVC: Have you ever spoken to him or heard from him?



NL: No, I haven’t.



“The Beast In Me” (from 1994’s The Impossible Bird)


NL: Oh, yes. There’s quite a well-documented story about that one, in a book called The Resurrection Of Johnny Cash, written by a British guy named Graeme Thompson. It’s specifically about Cash’s American Recordings, and the fact that his career was on the floor before he did that record. It was a very interesting time. People don’t really realize that, that John was really having a bad time before Rick Rubin came along and sorted him out. Anyway, I tell the story in depth in that book, and if you really want the details, it’s all in there. But in a nutshell, I had the idea for that song one night when John was in London to do shows. I had the idea one night, and stayed up all night writing that song. The first verse was great, but the rest of it was not very good, and I finished it rather in a hurry. And the next day, he came around to hear it. I tried to play him this song, and it was a disaster. It was so traumatic, playing him this song, because Carlene had told him how great it was. I was married to Carlene Carter at the time. He sort of liked the idea of it, and for about the next 12 years, whenever I’d see him, he’d always ask me how the song was coming, if I’d finished it, and I had sort of forgotten about it. I was so embarrassed by it I never wanted to hear it again. But he’d keep asking me about it, and every time he did, I’d have another look at it. Mentally, I’d have another look at this song. I couldn’t get anywhere with it.



And then after about 12 years, he was in London and I went to see him play. I was talking to him, and he asked me how his song was, and on this occasion I went home and I finished it, straight away. Sent it off to him. As I say, I wrote this song for him, with him specifically in mind. I wrote the song, sent it off to him on a demo, and didn’t hear anything back until my stepdaughter had been to visit him in Jamaica. She said, “Oh, he’s playing this song of yours all the time. Every time anyone comes to the house he plays the beast song.” And next thing I know, he recorded it on the American Recordings record, and I was extremely pleased about it. He was a fabulous bloke, and I miss him still—lovely, lovely guy. A handful, sure. Like all the best people are, he could be a handful. But he was a super bloke.


Nick Lowe Is Through With Producing, Worries About Lack of 'Magic' With Wilco




Nick Lowe has worn more than a few hats during his four decades in the music business. Though he's only scored one chart hit in the US (1979's 'Cruel to Be Kind'), he's released critically acclaimed albums like 1985's 'The Rose of England' and 1994's 'The Impossible Bird,' been a vital part of two supergroups, Rockpile and Little Village, and he's produced a long and incredibly varied list of artists, ranging from Elvis Costello to Richard Hell and the Voidoids.



2011 is proving to be a significant year for Lowe. In March, his 1979 album 'Labour of Lust' was reissued on CD with remastered sound and a pair of bonus tracks. Last month saw the release of 'Rockpile Live at Montreux 1980,' a rollicking, 16-track affair. And this week, Lowe returned with a new studio album, 'The Old Magic.' It's a successful but subdued effort that finds him joined by the likes of Paul Carrack, Jimmie Vaughan and Ron Sexsmith. On top of that, Lowe will support the album in the US when he opens for Wilco this fall. Spinner recently caught up with this musical jack-of-all-trades for a spirited, slightly self-deprecating conversation.



There's a song on your new album called 'Restless Feeling.' We read that it was supposedly written for a fictional band.



Yes [laughs]. Neil Brockbank and Bobby Irwin had a record label and they put out one release [but] it was fantastic, with Dan Penn and Spooner Oldham, legendary Memphis musicians who did some shows with me in the UK. We recorded the shows and made a live album, which they put out on their label, Blue Five.




One night, we were in Japan. We'd had a few drinks, and we thought it'd be really funny if we made a Blue Five kind of sampler record, like they used to do where record labels would put an album out with their artists all doing one track. We were thinking about what the names of some of these artists might be. One of these artists was going to be a kind of over-the-hill boy band, sort of a cross between New Kids on the Block and the Osmond Brothers. And we had a fictional name for this band -- they were called Coastline. We thought this was real funny, you know, and I started thinking of a song that Coastline might sing, and it was 'Restless Feeling.' We thought it was a pretty good track! So it went from being a joke to being on the record.



Many artists have cited you as one of the songwriters they admire. Who are some of the songwriters you admire?



That's a very good question. Bob Dylan is the greatest but I don't spend much time listening to his records. I sort of dip in and out of Bob. But he is the greatest, I think.



My favorite contemporary songwriters [are] Randy Newman and Ron Sexsmith. But in the main, I tend to listen to dead people most of all [laughs]. I really like Arthur Alexander, Don Gibson, Johnny Cash, Merle Haggard. Those are the people I really admire and try to emulate.



Isn't Merle still with us?



I believe he is! I'm sure I would have [heard] if he wasn't.



You have some other interesting stuff going on this year. One thing is a new live Rockpile album, 'Live at Montreux.' Why was it reissued some 30 years after the fact?



Well, I have no control over that stuff. Maybe because no one thought it was much good!



And now you're going to be doing a tour with Wilco.



That's right. I'm doing [them] on my own and I'm really looking forward to it. I hope it works. [Wilco are] playing slightly bigger rooms than I play -- well, quite a bit bigger rooms than I play! They're playing fairly big theaters, probably right at the limit that my thing will [go] over, you know, with an acoustic guitar. But I've done that sort of work before. If I can get at least a proportion of their audience who might not have ever heard of me to get on my side, that would be really fantastic. The trick is to make it so that you don't bore people.



The more worrying thing for me is the fact that everybody tells me what a fantastic time I'm gonna have with Wilco and what great guys they are! Have you ever been in that situation where you meet someone and you say to them, "I've got this friend. You're really gonna like him"? Then when they actually meet each other, they don't really hit it off that well!



It's even worse when you hear that you're about to meet the girl of your dreams, and you meet her and that turns out not to be the case at all.



[Laughs] Goodbye, love!



You've been involved in some real watershed events over the years. 'So It Goes' was the first Stiff Records single. You produced the Damned, who were arguably the first punk rock band. Did you have any idea while you were going through these events that they were, in fact, landmark events?



Not really, no. I thought, "Oh, this is good, no one's done this before." But one of the things about being the first person to do [something is that] you don't really think it's gonna work. You think it'd be too good to be true if the thing actually caught fire. It's when you're sort of fifth or sixth along, you know, and whatever it is that you've joined is up and running, you say, "I stand a bit of chance here." If you're the first one, you never think it's gonna work.



Is there any artist you would still like to produce?



No, I'm through with producing, really. I do my own records and I really enjoy doing that. I'm really quite set in my ways now and I wouldn't want to sort of inflict that on somebody else. It's also quite expensive, the way I make records. I use real musicians and an expensive studio. In my opinion, [it's] the last really great studio in London, and it doesn't come cheap. And nowadays, there really isn't the money to spend on producing people like that.



The other thing is that I take a lot of care over how my records sound and I think that they sound good, but I'm very aware that it's unlikely I'll ever be a mainstream recording artist because of the way my records sound. I really like the homemade quality [of] my records. As soon as [they] start, you can tell that there are human beings at work. Some people find that delightful, and I'm very pleased about that. But the vast majority of the public doesn't find it delightful. They find it unsettling because they're conditioned to hear their popular music done on machines and they know there won't be any kind of mistakes unless they're totally by design. Don't get me wrong -- I'm not complaining about this. There are many, many great records made on computers, but I'm not interested in making records that way. And I'm afraid I have to be content with the fact that my stuff will only appeal to a limited number of people. I don't think Beyonce will ever have to look over her shoulder!


Nick Lowe Makes "The Old Magic" New Sound




Review of Nick Lowe’s The Old Magic (Yep Roc).Nick Lowe’s staunchest long-time supporter in the music business has been Elvis Costello – Lowe produced Costello’s first albums, they toured together, and Costello insured Lowe’s place in rock history (and ability to earn a living) by covering and popularizing his “(What’s So Funny ‘Bout) Peace, Love and Understanding.”



Yet it’s hard to find two great singer-songwriters more different than Lowe and Costello at this stage in their careers. Costello’s work revels in the craftsmanship and effort that goes into the wordplay and melodic construction. He likes making you see that his art is very, very thought-through and dense with ideas. And his restless ambition propels him to keep tackling new and different styles.



Lowe, who at 62 is five years older than Costello, sounds on The Old Magic as natural – and at peace – with his musical approach as the Dalai Lama does at prayer. His craftsmanship is seamless. His songs and his vocals, a relaxed and warm but never slick form of gently introspective country- and soul-tinged Americana, fit him as well as crooning did Bing Crosby. And his writing – eight of the 11 songs here are his – is both artfully careful and as casual as conversation. It’s also dreamily romantic, but in a very adult way.



It’s as if Lowe, looking at the history of the kind of country music he loved, decided that it isn’t the hard-living outlaw stuff that allures him, as it does so many Americana artists, but the slightly mournful, casually elegant burnished ballads of Eddie Arnold or Jim Reeves (“He’ll Have to Go’).



Reeves was called “Gentleman Jim” for his delicately expressive voice and Lowe could easily be called Gentleman Nick. Yet Lowe isn’t just reviving a style; there’s something crucially new here. That kind of music was known as countrypolitan because the pop-styled arrangements seemed to hide the roots. They sometimes cloaked good melodies and lyrics in artificiality.



But Lowe has found a way to bare its soul while also revealing his own. The arrangements have overtones of the early Muscle Shoals sound of Arthur Alexander, as well as just a touch of the mysteriously ruminative uptown soul of, say, the Drifters’ “Mexican Divorce” or Ruby & the Romantics’ “Our Day Will Come.”



His band of Geraint Watkins on keyboards, Steve Donnelly on guitar and Robert Treherne on drums is perfectly attuned to his intentions. It’s too active to be called “backing,” yet never tries to usurp his voice. Occasionally, there’s a bit of a Tex-Mex sound to the organ, or even a ska-like swing to the horns (on his cover of Jeff West’s “You Don’t Know Me At All”). Lowe and Treherne produced the record with Neil Brockbank.



Lowe’s “Sensitive Man,” with the ever-so-slight male background harmonies and the muted brightness of the horns, could be an early-1960s Burt Bacharach-Hal David composition by way of Nashville. And the lonely organ and wandering bass on the lovely “‘Til the Real Thing Comes Along” dredge up memories of “Any Day Now” and “On Broadway.”



Yet The Old Magic has an honesty to the writing that is more important to Lowe than conquering any particular style. He may make it look easy, but he obviously works hard at it, which is why this is his first release since 2007.



And he isn’t merely trying to find the best rhyme (although he has a keen knack for internal rhymes within a line). He’s trying to make sense of his surroundings, while surrounding himself with the ghosts of music past. And often they conjure the ghosts of personal memories past; the songs are often about lost love and personal failings. The lyrics to the metaphoric “Checkout Time,” which is both playful and revelatory, includes “Must I be condemned, forever damned for some long forgotten crime/Or singing Rock of Ages with the angels soon after checkout time.”



His songs about heartbreak and loneliness are tight wonders, focusing on some specific object or activity to illustrate his feelings in a concrete, vernacular way – as in the instant classic “House for Sale” and “I Read a Lot.”



The one song that works less well than the others is written by Costello, “The Poisoned Rose.” And it’s a good one, too – a melodically twisty, slow-build torch song, part jazz/blues and part George Jones, that builds to an exciting finish. But it also lets you know it’s written to impress you, whereas Lowe’s songs seem as second nature to the ear as air to the lung. And also as valuable. He’s a modern master.


Dr. Oz Finds Arsenic in Many Top Apple Juice Brands




Back in July, we told you about the the extremely high levels of arsenic found in Mott’s Apple Juice. Now there’s even more bad news for apple juice manufacturers, as NBC’s Medical Expert, Dr. Oz, reports that his team has found arsenic in many more of the nation’s top apple juice brands. The Dr. Oz team conducted a huge study on leading apple juice brands, such as Minute Maid Apple Juice, Apple and Eve Apple Juice, Mott’s, Juicy Juice, and Gerber, finding high levels of arsenic in most of them. Arsenic is a metal that can cause cancer and other health problems, so you absolutely don’t want your child drinking it. Yet, if you buy popular, non-organic brands of apple juice, that’s just what your child may be drinking. Keep reading to find out which apple juice brands contained too much arsenic.



When Mott’s Apple Juice was tested back in July, it registered 55 parts per billion of arsenic. That’s more than five times the level of arsenic that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows in drinking water. The EPA sets limits on water, but not juice, stating that drinking water, to be considered safe can only contain 10 parts per billion of arsenic. Most of the juices tested by Dr. Oz, contained much more arsenic than this:



•Gerber Apple Juice’s highest test sample for arsenic was 36 parts per billion!


•Juicy Juice Apple Juice’s highest test sample for arsenic was 22 parts per billion.


•Apple and Eve Apple Juice’s highest test sample for arsenic was 11 parts per billion.


Mott’s Apple Juice, although called out this summer, still had a high test sample for arsenic registering at 16 parts per billion. Minute Maid Apple Juice came out ahead of the game with a high test sample of just 3 parts per billion. You can see all test results at the Dr. Oz website. Yikes. Most of these apple juice brands contain levels of arsenic that are far too high.


After uncovering these insanely high arsenic test results, The Dr. Oz Show decided to reach out to the apple juice companies, along with Juice Products Association to get their side of the story. The Juice Products Association has taken offense, noting the following on their website:


The results of tests for arsenic in apple juice that were shared by the Dr. Oz Show with the Juice Products Association should not be interpreted as fact. Subsequent testing of the same lots of juice from two of the named brands, using an appropriate method for testing arsenic levels in juice, found significantly lower levels of arsenic, all well under any FDA level of concern. The results reported on the Dr. Oz program were based upon a test method intended for use with water… In addition, to compare the trace levels of arsenic in apple juice to the regulatory guidelines for drinking water is not appropriate because regulatory agencies have set lower thresholds for drinking water than for food and other beverages because people consume larger amounts of water.


All the other juice companies, including Gerber, Juicy Juice and Apple & Eve released statements commenting on the tests as well. The statements, to sum up, pretty much say that the Dr. Oz tests are wrong, noting that the tests used were meant for testing arsenic in water, not juice, and that all the juice tested is perfectly safe


Still, juice company statements don’t change the fact that arsenic, in varying levels was found in some juice and not others. For example, none of the organic apple juice tested by Dr. Oz contained high levels of arsenic. Also American-made juices were less likely to contain high levels of arsenic than those made in other countries, yet Food & Water Watch (F&WW) says that 2/3 of all apple juice consumed in the U.S. comes from China, a country that still uses arsenic-based pesticides. To counter that, the juice companies are making a big deal about how the FDA does tests for safe apple juice, but how much juice are they really testing? Food Safety News points out that less than 2% of imported food is actually inspected by the FDA. Also, let’s be realistic. The juice companies can argue all they like, but does arsenic belong in juice at all? As Dr. Oz points out, “there should be no allowable amount of arsenic in apple juice consumed by children.” We agree. Why not aim for arsenic-free juice if possible? Or at the very least, stick to the EPA allowable arsenic in water amounts. For now, if you want to try and avoid arsenic in juice, your best best is to buy organic apple juice made in the USA.